<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: jQuery 1.4 Is Out!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.acodingfool.com/2010/01/14/jquery-1-4-is-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.acodingfool.com/2010/01/14/jquery-1-4-is-out/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:35:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: acodingfool</title>
		<link>http://blog.acodingfool.com/2010/01/14/jquery-1-4-is-out/comment-page-1/#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>acodingfool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.acodingfool.com/?p=711#comment-841</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If jQuery&#039;s ease of use is tantamount to &quot;a fairly easy learning curve for noobies&quot;, are you suggesting that YUI and Dojo are overly-complicated frameworks that only a seasoned programmer could tackle? jQuery is popular because they&#039;ve managed to pull off something that is actually quite difficult to accomplish when designing a framework; making it easy to use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, jQuery as a framework is not perfect. I feel that it is lacking much of the enhancements that extend the functionality to the JavaScript language (like as much of Prototype does). However, I have found one library that looks promising called &lt;a href=&quot;http://documentcloud.github.com/underscore/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Underscore&lt;/a&gt;. The developer describes it as &quot;the tie to go along with jQuery&#039;s tux&quot; and it may fill in what I&#039;ve felt has been missing in jQuery.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If jQuery&#8217;s ease of use is tantamount to &#8220;a fairly easy learning curve for noobies&#8221;, are you suggesting that YUI and Dojo are overly-complicated frameworks that only a seasoned programmer could tackle? jQuery is popular because they&#8217;ve managed to pull off something that is actually quite difficult to accomplish when designing a framework; making it easy to use.</p>
<p>On the other hand, jQuery as a framework is not perfect. I feel that it is lacking much of the enhancements that extend the functionality to the JavaScript language (like as much of Prototype does). However, I have found one library that looks promising called <a href="http://documentcloud.github.com/underscore/" rel="nofollow">Underscore</a>. The developer describes it as &#8220;the tie to go along with jQuery&#8217;s tux&#8221; and it may fill in what I&#8217;ve felt has been missing in jQuery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beau</title>
		<link>http://blog.acodingfool.com/2010/01/14/jquery-1-4-is-out/comment-page-1/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>Beau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.acodingfool.com/?p=711#comment-838</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious why jQuery has become so popular. My guess is that it has a fairly easy learning curve for noobies who really don&#039;t want to know how something works, they just want some easy way to add glitz and be done with it. I&#039;ve been using YUI2 for years now. Interestingly, jQuery is much slower than YUI or Dojo. Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious why jQuery has become so popular. My guess is that it has a fairly easy learning curve for noobies who really don&#8217;t want to know how something works, they just want some easy way to add glitz and be done with it. I&#8217;ve been using YUI2 for years now. Interestingly, jQuery is much slower than YUI or Dojo. Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
